Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jarmila Wolfe vs Aiko Nakamura Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wolfe vs Nakamura analysis and find out who is favored!
Jarmila Wolfe vs Aiko Nakamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wolfe 1 - 1 Nakamura
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wolfe has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nakamura has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wolfe, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakamura has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wolfe has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakamura has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wolfe has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakamura winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wolfe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 54/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29). Nakamura has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 145/ 139), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 19% (W/L 4/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wolfe winning 1 times and Nakamura being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Wolfe winning 2 and Nakamura winning 2. The last match between Wolfe and Nakamura was at the HP Japan Women's Open - Osaka, 11-10-2011, First, Hard with Jarmila Wolfe getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:26:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wolfe and Nakamura have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wolfe winning 0 times and Nakamura 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wolfe winning 0, and Nakamura 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wolfe has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakamura has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wolfe has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakamura has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wolfe has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakamura has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
47
High
40
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
58% (382-271)
Career Total W/L
52% (224-210)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$987,626
Career Prize Money
$296,110
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jarmila Wolfe vs Aiko Nakamura For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wolfe VS Nakamura
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jarmila Wolfe | Aiko Nakamura |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:26:17 | 0:26:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 42% (14/33) | 61% (28/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (12/14) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 17% (3/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (29/46) | 27% (9/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Aiko Nakamura
42%
(
14 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarmila Wolfe | Aiko Nakamura |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jarmila Wolfe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
39%
(
36 of
92)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Grace Min
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Julia Jones
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Chiara Scholl
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizaveta Ianchuk
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
76 of
117)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Aiko Nakamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Aiko Nakamura
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Aiko Nakamura
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aiko Nakamura
Player
Victoria Larriere
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Dubois
Player
Aiko Nakamura
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aiko Nakamura
Player
Sherazad Reix
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aiko Nakamura
Player
Nicole Rottmann
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Wolfe Vs Nakamura Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wolfe are available here and Nakamura photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
